• at least 200words

1. “YouTube has no ethics, it's been created for the sole purpose of entertainment and money.” Do you agree?
2. “The real innovation that Youtube provides is that --- individuals and groups can produce entertainment. The lawsuit is one of the Great Battles over who controls or provides access.” Do you agree?

question 1 : “YouTube has no ethics, it's been created for the sole purpose of entertainment and money.” Do you agree?

The number of viewers in youtube everyday is counted in millions or even billions. Hence we can tell that youtube really provides great entertainment to many and advertisements on youtube will be effective. Hence advertisers will be more than willing to pay and put for the advertisement to be put on youtube. What kind of entertainment can cause the rate of viewers to be so high everyday?


On 4april2007, The Thai government has banned access to the YouTube video-uploading website after it broadcast material critical of the country's king. Such cases indicate that youtube has no ethnics. It claims that the user who uploaded the video did not violate any of their rules and regulations. This goes to show that the rules and regulations to be abided by are not very strict. Further more, Google refuse to take it off after being requested by the Thai government. Therefore, the entertainment that is provided by youtube is merely silly and useless as it has no ethnics. People who want watch it may be because it is free and can act as an entertainment to kill time. Therefore, I agree with the statement to a large extent. :)